Page 1 of 1

Converter definition for C-BAND LNBs

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2022 8:50 pm
by ik8xld
Hi Simon,
after our messages on twitter, here I am to better describe converter definition needed for the C-band LNBs.
Currently UP or DOWN converters definitions are working subtracting or adding the local oscillator value (OFFSET) from the frequency: (FREQUENCY - OFFSET)
For C-BAND LNBs converter definition calculation should be:
OFFSET - FREQUENCY
an example:
Desired frequency 3623 MHz (to shown on software)
LNB offset 5150 MHZ (settable offset)
calculation: 5150-3623=1527 MHz (1527 SDR Frequency)

TNX in advance

Re: Converter definition for C-BAND LNBs

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2022 6:45 am
by Simon G4ELI
Ah,

Now I understand.

Re: Converter definition for C-BAND LNBs

Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2022 10:44 am
by ik8xld
Tnx Simon,
of course I'm available for any info and test

Re: Converter definition for C-BAND LNBs

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2022 8:38 am
by ik8xld
Hi Simon,
I think that a custom converter definition that can be configured in this way can satisfy all requests.
In attach also a classic C-BAND LNB spec.
73 Rocco IK8XLD

Re: Converter definition for C-BAND LNBs

Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2022 7:13 pm
by Max
ik8xld wrote: Mon Apr 25, 2022 8:38 am Hi Simon,
I think that a custom converter definition that can be configured in this way can satisfy all requests.
In attach also a classic C-BAND LNB spec.
73 Rocco IK8XLD
Rocco

A question to you in my ignorance:

What is the reason for running the LO in the LNB at 5150 and not 2450?

73

Max

Re: Converter definition for C-BAND LNBs

Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2022 1:02 pm
by ik8xld
Hi Max,
I do not imagine the reason but they are all like this.
Have the oscillator at 5150 MHz.

73 Rocco Labella IK8XLD

Re: Converter definition for C-BAND LNBs

Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2022 8:06 pm
by Max
OK Rocco thank you. Seems odd as one might imagine the frequency stability is harder at the higher frequency!

73

Max

Re: Converter definition for C-BAND LNBs

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 9:28 am
by ik8xld
A possible explanation could be that a 2450 MHz OL would be too close to the IF. (950 - 1750 MHZ)

73 Rocco Labella IK8XLD