Search found 126 matches

by sm6fhz
Sat Dec 19, 2020 5:44 pm
Forum: Requests
Topic: USB-relay control via server
Replies: 12
Views: 945

Re: USB-relay control via server

Thanks for the hint Leon.
I will look at them as a quick solution even thou I have other USB relay boards at hand.
73 / Ingolf
by sm6fhz
Fri Dec 18, 2020 5:03 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Introduction
Replies: 0
Views: 227

Introduction

Introduction Let me cite the lyrics in the first lines of the first tune on side 2 of the B,S & T album B, S & T 3 (1970). Some of you might remember this album. I have been kind of active here with quite a few posts recently. You might have seen some of them. I felt that it might be appropr...
by sm6fhz
Fri Dec 18, 2020 8:42 am
Forum: Requests
Topic: USB-relay control via server
Replies: 12
Views: 945

Re: USB-relay control via server

OK Simon.

I understand.
I will try to write something for a Raspberry 4 with an Web-interface to control the USB-relays.
Even it will be additional HW and one more S/W to use ;-) A non optimal solution.

Have a nice Holiday Season!

73 / Ingolf, SM6FHZ
by sm6fhz
Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:09 pm
Forum: Requests
Topic: USB-relay control via server
Replies: 12
Views: 945

Re: USB-relay control via server

Simon. Just give me a notice when you would like me to test this feature, please. I have arrangements ready that would make it very quick and easy to try this feature out on a remote basis. A swell feature now in MW-DX-season at it's top. But, first have a good rest before Christmas. 73 / Ingolf, SM...
by sm6fhz
Fri Dec 11, 2020 2:14 pm
Forum: Requests
Topic: MF Channel Markers
Replies: 2
Views: 318

Re: MF Channel Markers

Hi Paul. I use the "Step" & "Snap" tuning feature for this. When chasing TA-stations I use 10 kHz for SAM (AM) and for non-TA-stations I use 9 kHz. For SW you can use 5 kHz if you like. For other modes you can set other values of the step parameter. See attached screenshot. W...
by sm6fhz
Wed Dec 09, 2020 7:50 pm
Forum: Requests
Topic: Add a 1500 kHz BW choice for WAN in SDR-server
Replies: 12
Views: 654

Re: Add a 1500 kHz BW choice for WAN in SDR-server

Yes Simon. I got aware of that I had used Swedish characters in the folder name, "Råö". It has worked before but might cause problems now. I have changed the folder name now as can be seen in the "Folder" line The question mark I was referring to was the one in front of the "...
by sm6fhz
Tue Dec 08, 2020 3:37 pm
Forum: Requests
Topic: Add a 1500 kHz BW choice for WAN in SDR-server
Replies: 12
Views: 654

Re: Add a 1500 kHz BW choice for WAN in SDR-server

One more screenshot is appropriate for this issue, the "Scheduler Definition Window".
I noted that there is an "?" in front of the radio definition. That might have an meaning.
73 / Ingolf, SM6FHZ
by sm6fhz
Tue Dec 08, 2020 3:22 pm
Forum: Requests
Topic: Add a 1500 kHz BW choice for WAN in SDR-server
Replies: 12
Views: 654

Re: Add a 1500 kHz BW choice for WAN in SDR-server

Hi Simon. Yes, we all do as much as we possibly can to keep you busy :twisted: I have done some more testing and it does work now remotely accessing (it was not locally, sorry if I was unclear before) the AFEDRI directly via it's IP and it starts OK, but it does not stop after the recording is done,...
by sm6fhz
Tue Dec 08, 2020 1:27 pm
Forum: Requests
Topic: Add a 1500 kHz BW choice for WAN in SDR-server
Replies: 12
Views: 654

Re: Add a 1500 kHz BW choice for WAN in SDR-server

Hi Simon. I have now been streaming IQ-data from my AFEDRI Net via the SDRC-server for two nights at 1333 MHz BW and it has been running very smoothly without any hiccups. Thanks for implementing this feature, Simon! Great work. However, I found that I was not able to make scheduled recordings via t...
by sm6fhz
Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:37 pm
Forum: General
Topic: IQ-recording window starts slowly at high load
Replies: 13
Views: 687

Re: IQ-recording window starts slowly at high load

Hi Simon. The amount of delay seem to be related to the amount of RAM used (or rather the amount of RAM available). If the used amount of RAM is ~50% the delay is ~20 sec if RAM used is ~85% it goes up to 10 min. It seems to be SDRC that eats RAM, so I reduced all buffers to a minimum. No signs of t...