For me and another radio amateur friend, the sensitivity in the display dropped drastically after installing 3.3. Where previously S9+5 were at the top of the upper QO-100 beacon, I only saw S3.
We had installed the new version over the old one 3.2, so the settings should be the same, right?
What are we doing wrong and what should be done?
73 DL1NM, Gerd
V3.3 Issue
Re: V3.3 Issue
Screenshots using the "screenshot" button with the DSP panel and radio settings displayed would be most helpful.
Do not place them in the text, but attach them (full editor must be enabled, below the text box).
Installing updates are placed over the current version, so you are correct, settings "should" be the same.
73 Kriss KA1GJU
Do not place them in the text, but attach them (full editor must be enabled, below the text box).
Installing updates are placed over the current version, so you are correct, settings "should" be the same.
73 Kriss KA1GJU
73 Kriss KA1GJU Home of the KA1GJU Super Station SDRC Servers in NH, USA (FN42mw & FN43na)
Re: V3.3 Issue
Gerd, what is the hardware? Pluto, Lime?DL1NM wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2024 12:44 pm For me and another radio amateur friend, the sensitivity in the display dropped drastically after installing 3.3. Where previously S9+5 were at the top of the upper QO-100 beacon, I only saw S3.
We had installed the new version over the old one 3.2, so the settings should be the same, right?
What are we doing wrong and what should be done?
73 DL1NM, Gerd
72
Max
Re: V3.3 Issue
One might also ask, "Has the readability of any of the incoming signals changed?"
{^_^}
{^_^}
Re: V3.3 Issue
NESDRMax wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2024 8:23 pmGerd, what is the hardware? Pluto, Lime?DL1NM wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2024 12:44 pm For me and another radio amateur friend, the sensitivity in the display dropped drastically after installing 3.3. Where previously S9+5 were at the top of the upper QO-100 beacon, I only saw S3.
We had installed the new version over the old one 3.2, so the settings should be the same, right?
What are we doing wrong and what should be done?
73 DL1NM, Gerd
72
Max
Re: V3.3 Issue
In the next days I will start with 3.3 again "from the beginning". At the moment I run 3.2 and thus it doesn't make sense to post a current screenshot .KA1GJU wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2024 8:01 pm Screenshots using the "screenshot" button with the DSP panel and radio settings displayed would be most helpful.
Do not place them in the text, but attach them (full editor must be enabled, below the text box).
Installing updates are placed over the current version, so you are correct, settings "should" be the same.
73 Kriss KA1GJU
Re: V3.3 Issue
The reason I asked if Pluto or Lime is that in 3.3 some recent changes were made to Visual Gain calibration in the Lime. Be interesting to know what hardware you are running?DL1NM wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 3:18 pmIn the next days I will start with 3.3 again "from the beginning". At the moment I run 3.2 and thus it doesn't make sense to post a current screenshot .KA1GJU wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2024 8:01 pm Screenshots using the "screenshot" button with the DSP panel and radio settings displayed would be most helpful.
Do not place them in the text, but attach them (full editor must be enabled, below the text box).
Installing updates are placed over the current version, so you are correct, settings "should" be the same.
73 Kriss KA1GJU
Max
Re: V3.3 Issue
So what are you using as the sampler plugin to SDRC? "#5" is not an answer. (It also sounds, from what I've read, that you are expecting readings that are unrealistically high. And, no, sometimes there are changes to the apparent "calibration" of the uncalibrated non-instrument colloquially called SDRC.
{^_^}
{^_^}